In what some are calling the most bizarre yet entertaining debate of the year, Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump took the stage to settle a critical issue gripping the cannabis community: sungrown vs. indoor cannabis. With bold claims, sharp jabs, and plenty of swagger, Trump and Harris both laid out their visions for America’s green future, each determined to prove their preferred cannabis method as the superior choice.

Harris, kicking off the debate, made her case for sungrown cannabis, emphasizing its environmental benefits and natural flavor profile. “Sungrown cannabis reflects our values as a society that respects the earth. When you choose sungrown, you’re supporting sustainable, organic growth that truly connects people to the power of nature,” she said, in a calm yet assertive tone.

But Trump quickly took the floor, scoffing at her remarks. “Folks, listen, sungrown is okay, it’s fine. But it’s just not the best. Indoor cannabis is where the real quality is,” he declared, with that trademark confidence. “I’m talking about high standards, folks. Precision. Consistency. Indoor is controlled—absolutely beautiful, pristine conditions. I’ve seen the indoor setups, and believe me, it’s like the Trump Tower of cannabis growing. The best lights, the best air, everything you could ask for.”

The back-and-forth continued as Harris took a shot at indoor’s high energy consumption. “Indoor growing has a significant environmental impact, and we can’t ignore it,” she argued. “If we’re serious about sustainability, we can’t keep pretending indoor is a long-term solution. Sungrown is the only responsible choice for the planet.”

Trump, unfazed, dismissed her concerns with a wave. “Kamala, Kamala—you want to talk about ‘significant impact’? Indoor cannabis is the highest-quality product there is. People want reliability. They want perfection, not some plant that’s been sitting outside, rained on, who knows what else. Indoor growers are professionals—total pros—and they give you a product you can actually count on.”

As the debate wound down, audience reactions were mixed. Harris supporters rallied behind the hashtag #SunForAll, while Trump fans quickly began trending #BestBudsIndoors, declaring their loyalty to the high-tech wonders of indoor growing. Calls for unity from hybrid enthusiasts emerged with a tentative hashtag, #Can’tWeAllJustSmoke, but neither side seemed ready to budge.

In the end, the debate left cannabis lovers as divided as ever, with no clear winner except the cannabis community itself, which proved that, no matter the choice, Americans are passionate about their buds. Whether lit by sunlight or LED, the great sungrown vs. indoor divide has become yet another fiery front in America’s green revolution.